Lynn Landes 
 The Landes Report ...

Go back to Voting Machine Webpage


 FLORIDA 2004 - HUGE CROSSOVER VOTES FOR BUSH?  Or did voting machine company-insiders rig their programs to favor a Republican at the top of the ticket?  Remember, 80% of all votes are electronically process by two corporations that have close ties to the Republican party.

CHECK OUT THE DATA IN YELLOW FOR 'BALLOT SCANNED' COUNTIES.   It is clear that vast majority of independents and third parties voted for either Bush or Kerry.  But, the second table below indicates that all the independents may have gone to Bush, PLUS there must have been a huge crossover of Democrats from Kerry to Bush - but only in counties that used computerized ballot scanners.  The difference between touch screen counties and ballot scan counties is immense when looking at the % of votes cast for Bush based on Republican registration versus the % of votes cast for Kerry based on Democratic registration.  Is there any rational explanation?  I've contacted the Florida Democratic Party for a response.  Lynn 11/10/04

Nov. 9, 2004: Last night Peter Jennings of ABC News suggested that "conspiracy theorists" have got it all wrong; that despite their registration, the voters in Lafayette County have always voted in enormous numbers for Republican presidential candidates.  But how long has the county been using ballot scanners?  These scanners have been around since 1964.  The election results could have been routinely altered for decades, which is exactly what the late Collier brothers alleged in their book, VoteScam: The Stealing of America.  The fact is that Americans don't count their own votes; they let companies owned by Republicans and foreigners do it for them.  We will never know who really won the election.


Registered Democrats (4,261,249) + Republicans (3,892,492) + Others (2,147,994) = 10,301,735 TOTAL

  %
Report
Bush / Cheney
(REP)
Kerry / Edwards
(DEM)
Peroutka / Baldwin
(CPF)
Badnarik / Campagna
(LIB)
Cobb / LaMarche
(GRE)
Harris / Trowe
(SWP)
Brown / Herbert
(SPF)
Nader / Camejo
(REF)
Total   3,956,290 3,575,000 6,609 11,982 3,907 2,732 3,501 32,894
Percent 100.0% 52.1% 47.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%

YELLOW DATA FORMULA: 

This data indicates if the candidate got more or less of his party's registration numbers. 

CANDIDATE'S VOTES X 100 PARTY REGISTRATION = ELECTION RESULTS BASED ON PARTY REGISTRATION (YELLOW)

    candidate's votes                                 X   
candidate's party registration #s                   100


TOUCH SCREEN COUNTIES 

(REG = registered / DEM = Democrat / REP = Republican)

County

TOUCH
SCREEN
(DRE)
Vendors

% of votes cast for Bush based on REP REG 

% of votes cast for Kerry based on DEM REG

% of votes cast for Others based on Others REG

All Votes cast x 100 Registered voters = % Turnout

BUSH % OF VOTES CAST KERRY % OF VOTES CAST OTHERS % OF VOTES CAST REP
 % of TOTAL REG
DEM
% of TOTAL REG

Others
% of TOTAL REG

BUSH
VOTES

KERRY VOTES

OTHER
VOTES

REP REG

DEM REG

Others 
REG

TOTAL
REG
VOTERS

ALL VOTES CAST

Broward

ES&S

83.5%

82.7%

3.4%

64.9%

34.5% 64.3% 1.2% 26.8% 50.5% 22.7%

236,794

441,733

8188

283,736

533,976

240,357

1,058,069

686,715

Charlotte

ES&S

86.9%

94.3%

4.2%

70.0%

55.7% 42.9% 1.4% 44.9% 31.9% 23.2%

44,402

34,227

1101

51,100

36,306

26,402

113,808

79,730

Collier

ES&S

92.1%

105.2%

3.0%

75.2%

65.0% 34.1% 0.9% 53.1% 24.4% 22.5%

82,493

43,277

1146

89,559

41,082

38,032

168,673

126,916

Hillsborough

Sequoia 

110.8%

81.4%

2.4%

73.4%

53.0% 46.3% 0.8% 35.1% 41.7% 23.3%

241,630

210,892

3448

217,766

258,882

144,553

621,201

455,970

Indian River

Sequoia 

87.7%

97.4%

3.2%

74.8%

60.2% 39.0% 0.8% 51.3% 30.0% 18.7%

36,744

23,850

493

41,866

24,515

15,262

81,643

61,087

Lake

ES&S

96.7%

86.7%

4.5%

76.4%

60.0% 39.9% 1.1% 47.4% 34.3% 18.4%

73,971

47,963

1335

76,387

55,258

29,624

161,269

123,269

Lee

ES&S

78.8%

84.9%

3.3%

63.4%

59.0% 39.8% 1.2% 47.5% 29.7% 22.7%

114,153

76,874

2299

144,948

90,716

69,273

304,937

193,326

Martin

ES&S

79.5%

110.9%

4.5%

73.2%

57.1% 41.7% 1.2% 52.5% 27.5% 20.0%

41,303

30,149

882

51,869

27,203

19,785

98,857

72,334

Miami-Dade

ES&S

88.6%

84.5%

1.5%

67.3%

45.8% 53.7% 0.5% 34.8% 42.8% 22.4%

326,362

383,032

3628

368,334

453,631

236,836

1,058,801

713,022

Nassau

ES&S

116.9%

56.1%

6.6%

79.0%

72.7% 26.2% 1.2% 49.1% 36.8% 14.1%

23,726

8,543

387

20,300

15,218

5835

41,353

32,656

Palm Beach

Sequoia 

74.6%

83.6%

1.7%

62.0%

38.5% 60.8% 0.6% 32.0% 45.1% 22.9%

174,233

275,030

2798

233,495

329,232

166,848

729,575

452,061

Pasco

ES&S

96.8%

85.4%

4.9%

71.8%

54.1% 44.4% 1.5% 40.0% 37.3% 22.6%

103,195

84,729

2937

106,649

99,272

60,053

265,974

190,861

Pinellas

Sequoia 

96.0%

99.4%

3.0%

76.0%

49.6% 49.5% 0.9% 39.2% 37.8% 23.0%

222,630

222,103

4142

231,652

223,544

135,793

590,989

448,875

Sarasota

ES&S

90.6%

117.5%

5.0%

81.1%

53.5% 45.2% 1.3% 47.9% 31.2% 20.9%

104,446

88,225

2512

115,317

74,986

50,289

240,592

195,183

Sumter

ES&S

112.2%

70.1%

7.2%

78.6%

62.2% 36.4% 1.4% 43.5% 40.8% 15.6%

19,794

11,583

458

17,631

16,553

6339

40,523

31,835

BALLOT SCANNED COUNTIES

County

OP-SCAN
VENDOR

% of votes cast for Bush based on REP REG 

% of votes cast for Kerry based on DEM REG

% of votes cast for Others based on Others REG

 %
TURNOUT=
All Votes cast x 100 Registered voters

BUSH % OF VOTES CAST KERRY % OF VOTES CAST OTHERS % OF VOTES CAST REP
  % of TOTAL REG
DEM
% of TOTAL REG

Others
% of TOTAL REG

BUSH
VOTES

KERRY VOTES

OTHER
VOTES

REP REG

DEM REG

Others 
REG

TOTAL
REG
VOTERS

ALL VOTES CAST

Alachua

Diebold

120% 87% 3% 78% 43% 56% 0.1%

27.8%

50.5%

21.7%

47,615

62,348

1059 39,605 71,948 30,805

142,358

111,022

Baker

Sequoia 

248% 24% 4% 77% 78% 22% 0.4%

24.3%

69.3%

6.4%

7,738

2,180

37 3,126 8,926 835

12,887

9,955

Bay

ES&S

119% 53% 3% 74% 71% 28% 0.7%

44.2%

39.2%

16.6%

53,305

21,034

551 44,751 39,707 16,857

101,315

74,890

Bradford

ES&S

181% 36% 4% 74% 70% 30% 0.5%

28.3%

61.4%

10.3%

7,553

3,244

54 4,168 9,039 1514

14,721

10,851

Brevard

Diebold

101% 89% 3% 78% 58% 42% 0.8%

44.8%

36.5%

18.7%

152,838

110,153

2084 151,535 123,578 63,082

338,195

265,075

Calhoun

Diebold

381% 30% 14% 71% 63% 36% 1.1%

11.9%

82.4%

5.7%

3,780

2,116

65 993 6,879 478

8,350

5,961

Citrus

Diebold

105% 82% 4% 77% 57% 42% 1.0%

41.5%

38.9%

19.6%

39,496

29,271

690 37,653 35,340 17,787

90,780

69,457

Clay

ES&S

103% 69% 2% 76% 76% 23% 0.5%

56.5%

25.6%

17.9%

61,813

18,887

444 60,192 27,282 18,990

106,464

81,144

Columbia

Diebold

156% 41% 5% 73% 67% 32% 0.8%

31.3%

56.5%

12.2%

16,753

8,029

202 10,737 19,374 4171

34,282

24,984

DeSoto

Diebold

146% 44% 3% 64% 58% 41% 0.8%

25.4%

59.3%

15.3%

5,510

3,910

73 3,787 8,838 2276

14,901

9,493

Dixie

Diebold

305% 26% 7% 67% 69% 30% 0.7%

15.0%

77.5%

7.5%

4,433

1,959

48 1,454 7,495 727

9,676

6,440

Duval

Diebold

115% 66% 3% 73% 58% 42% 0.6%

36.9%

46.2%

16.9%

218,476

157,624

2230 190,111 238,264 86,827

515,202

378,330

Escambia

ES&S

112% 62% 0.4% 75% 65% 34% 1.0%

43.8%

40.7%

15.5%

93,311

48,207

1377 83,165 77,250 294,418

189,833

142,895

Flagler

Diebold

102% 103% 3% 82% 51% 48% 0.7%

40.7%

38.1%

21.2%

19,624

18,563

268 19,179 17,940 9949

47,068

38,455

Franklin

ES&S

286% 41% 11% 78% 59% 40% 0.1%

15.9%

77.3%

6.8%

3,472

2,400

58 1,212 5,893 515

7,620

5,930

Gadsden

ES&S

207% 66% 6% 78% 30% 70% 0.5%

11.2%

82.9%

5.9%

6,236

14,610

102 3,012 22,280 1592

26,884

20,948

Gilchrist

Diebold

179% 38% 6% 78% 70% 29% 0.9%

30.4%

58.6%

11%

4,930

2,015

62 2,750 5,295 990

9,035

7,007

Glades

Diebold

134% 37% 3% 58% 58% 42% 0.5%

24.8%

64.8%

10.4%

1,983

1,434

17 1,479 3,867 617

5,963

3,434

Gulf

ES&S

188% 37% 11% 75% 66% 33% 0.9%

26.6%

67.1%

6.3%

4,797

2,398

64 2,557 6,464 606

9,627

7,259

Hamilton

ES&S

244% 37% 6% 66% 55% 45% 0.5%

14.9%

78.9%

6.2%

2,786

2,252

27 1,140 6,029 476

7,645

5,065

Hardee

Diebold

182% 32% 5% 70% 70% 30% 0.7%

26.7%

63.8%

9.5%

5,047

2,147

51 2,779 6,630 990

10,399

7,245

Hendry

ES&S

109% 41% 3% 57% 59% 41% 0.6%

30.8%

56.5%

12.7%

5,756

3,960

58 5,279 9,688 2177

17,144

9,774

Hernando

Diebold

87% 82% 3% 69% 53% 46% 1.0%

41.3%

38.8%

19.9%

40,137

35,006

689 45,266 42,554 21,836

109,656

75,832

Highlands

ES&S

77% 54% 2% 56% 61% 39% 0.7%

44.5%

39.8%

15.7%

20,475

12,986

226 26,752 23,939 9485

60,176

33,687

Holmes

ES&S

273% 22% 12% 76% 77% 22% 1.0%

21.3%

72.7%

6.0%

6,410

1,810

78 2,344 7,988 650

10,982

8,298

Jackson

ES&S

203% 39% 7% 73% 61% 38% 0.7%

22.0%

71.5%

6.5%

12,092

7,529

129 5,962 19,411 1765

27,138

19,750

Jefferson

Diebold

171% 61% 7% 80% 44% 55% 0.6%

20.7%

72.3%

7%

3,298

4,134

45 1,929 6,726 645

9,300

7,477

Lafayette

ES&S

432% 24% 12% 77% 74% 25% 0.6%

13.2%

82.8%

4%

2,460

845

20 570 3,570 169

4,309

3,325

Leon

Diebold

105% 81% 3% 75% 37% 62% 0.6%

26.6%

57.1%

16.3%

47,902

79,591

823 45,578 97,672 27,932

171,182

128,316

Levy

Diebold

167% 45% 6% 74% 63% 37% 1.0%

27.6%

59.7%

12.7%

10,408

6,073

168 6,241 13,503 2873

22,617

16,649

Liberty

ES&S

602% 30% 15% 74% 64% 35% 0.8%

7.9%

88.3%

3.8%

1,927

1,070

24 320 3,597 158

4,075

3,021

Madison

Diebold

247% 45% 10% 73% 51% 49% 0.8%

14.9%

79.5%

5.6%

4,195

4,048

63 1,695 9,042 634

11,371

8,306

Manatee

Diebold

96% 97% 2% 75% 57% 43% 0.7%

44.3%

33.0%

22.7%

81,237

61,193

1039 84,804 63,305 43,526

191,635

143,469

Marion

ES&S

102% 78% 4% 76% 58% 41% 0.8%

43.2%

39.7%

17.1%

81,235

57,225

1121 79,572 73,168 31,517

184,257

139,581

Monroe

Diebold

98% 106% 3% 77% 49% 50% 1.0%

38.7%

36.1%

25.2%

19,457

19,646

414 19,874 18,563 12,940

51,377

39,517

Okaloosa

Diebold

95% 61% 3% 70% 78% 22% 0.8%

57.2%

24.7%

18.1%

69,320

19,276

692 72,885 31,526 23,044

127,455

89,288

Okeechobee

Diebold

126% 47% 3% 65% 57% 42% 0.5%

29.7%

58.5%

11.8%

6,975

5,150

59 5,537 10,891 2199

18,627

12,184

Orange

ES&S

103% 90% 2% 73% 50% 50% 0.6%

35.1%

40.2%

24.7%

191,389

192,030

2128 186,614 213,702 131,458

531,774

385,547

Osceola

Diebold

77% 58% 1% 49% 52% 48% 0.5%

32.8%

40.2%

27%

32,812

30,295

333 42,462 52,064 34,961

129,487

63,440

Polk

Diebold

107% 68% 2% 71% 59% 41% 0.6%

39.0%

42.6%

18.4%

123,457

85,923

1262 115,211 125,870 54,661

295,742

210,642

Putnam

Diebold

144% 47% 4% 68% 59% 40% 0.8%

28.1%

57.7%

14.2%

18,303

12,407

250 12,728 26,184 6432

45,344

30,960

Santa Rosa

ES&S

97% 54% 4% 70% 77% 22% 0.9%

55.9%

28.1%

16%

51,952

14,635

588 53,853 27,083 15,423

96,359

67,175

Seminole

Diebold

100% 99% 2% 77% 58% 41% 0.6%

44.6%

32.3%

23.1%

107,913

76,802

1047 107,613 77,964 55,653

241,230

185,762

St.Johns

Diebold

100% 84% 3% 78% 69% 31% 0.8%

53.3%

28.3%

18.4%

58,802

26,215

682 58,436 31,051 20,148

109,635

85,699

St.Lucie

Diebold

77% 76% 2% 78% 47% 52% 0.6%

36.6%

41.4%

22%

38,919

43,367

512 50,436 57,128 30,387

137,951

82,798

Suwannee

ES&S

189% 32% 6% 60% 71% 29% 0.8%

26.8%

63.6%

9.6%

11,145

4,513

127 5,885 13,941 2104

21,930

15,785

Taylor

Diebold

252% 35% 10% 75% 64% 36% 0.8%

18.9%

75.6%

5.5%

5,466

3,049

65 2,170 8,679 632

11,481

8,580

Union

ES&S

263% 23% 6% 66% 73% 27% 0.6%

18.3%

75.5%

6.2%

3,396

1,251

28 1,291 5,331 441

7,063

4,675

Volusia

Diebold

90% 85% 2% 67% 48% 51% 0.6%

35.9%

40.8%

23.3%

100,209

106,853

1348 111,372 126,405 72,153

309,930

208,410

Wakulla

Diebold

182% 48% 7% 76% 58% 42% 0.8%

24.2%

66.9%

8.9%

6,777

4,896

90 3,730 10,293 1373

15,396

11,763

Walton

Diebold

107% 52% 5% 73% 73% 26% 0.9%

50.1%

36.8%

13.1%

17,526

6,205

208 16,413 12,051 4313

32,777

23,939

Washington

Diebold

201% 30% 8% 72% 71% 28% 0.8%

25.4%

67.0%

7.6%

7,367

2,911

85 3,666 9,668 1087

14,421

10,363